I’m sorry, blog. I’m sorry that I lied to you about posting a mission statement, never followed through, and then disappeared for a month while you languished, alone and forsaken, wondering where I was and who I might be confiding in.
You see, I think I scared myself with that last post. Maybe I get scared too easily. It’s strange to be willing to watch you die an early death for fear of watching you die essentially the same death later. What’s my concern? Will the stakes be somehow higher? Am I scared I’ll get too attached?
I wanted to clarify my emotions about you, blog, so I did what I always do when I want to clarify my emotions about something: I filled out an online questionnaire/self-test. But since there don’t seem to be any online tests that measure one’s feelings about one’s blog, I had to improvise somewhat. Here’s the questionnaire – just substitute the word “blog” for the words “relationship”, “romantic partner”, and “partner” every time you see them.
It’s pretty clear from these answers that I have mixed feelings about you, blog. Indeed, my attachment style vis-a-vis you was characterized as “fearful-avoidant” – which sounds about right so far.
The “fearful-avoidant” individual, according to http://www.truthaboutdeception.com (- wait, what? what kind of site was I on?), is both anxious and dismissive about their relationship, and seeks both closeness and distance with their blog/romantic partner. In other words, I need you to be there for me, but back the f*ck off.
Sorry.
The fine folks at truthaboutdeception.com had some advice, though, for guys like me. They say that the only way forward is to start making promises that I can keep – and that only when I start keeping these promises can the process of rebuilding trust begin. They also – quite coyly, I think – suggest that when rebuilding trust this way, it’s “best to under-promise and over-deliver”.
With that in mind, I promise to post something at some point.
Something. Anything.
Hopefully soon.